sql - Run multiple stored procedures in sequence - Database Administrators Stack Exchange
Yes, I know that fundamentally SQL is about set operations and does not support what I want to do very well, but if there is a way, it will make the code much more concise. Is there a way to accomplish my stated goal, and if so, how? NOTE: based on what I asked here, a cursor would sound like a better implementation than a WHILE loop especially given the table variable
(In case you are thinking that XML or delimited strings could be an alternative here, permit me to point out that they, too, represent intermediate storage. One is the push model, where you create a rowset with the metadata, fill the rowset with your data, and in the regular parameter area, you pass the rowset pointer
If you want to return the single column result then prefer to use the output statement to return the result to the calling program rather than table result. Reader Level: Article Good Practices to Write Stored Procedures in SQL Server By Senthilkumar on Mar 01, 2012 sql server, sql server articles, stored procedures, stored procedures in sql server, tutorials, This explains the good practices for writing stored procedures in SQL Server and the advantages of writing stored procedures
SQL Server Forums - Stored Procedure Returns Multiple Result Sets
Then you can base views and sprocs off of that data.Here are some pieces to make the CLR from:Let's see: the CLR Sproc would have a custom table adapter used just for that sproc. You sure you want to base your reports off of that?If I were you, I would pirate the logic and the portions returning the results sets you need and create a separate set of stored procs following best practices design methodology (which does NOT include returning multiple result sets...)
Although a common table expression (CTE) can be used to recursively expand a tree relationship, internally it builds the entire tree before applying any filters to display the tree, starting at a specific level
Assuming the table structure is something sane, rather than having different number of columns in different rows as suggested by the sample data (that 1 in the first row is a customer id, absent in the second third and fourth rows, isn't it?) it is trivial, assuming that the actual requirement matches either the verbal description or the sample data and results, to write a single SQL statement which will do the job rather more quickly that 3 nested loops, but as the sample data and results contradict the verbal description it is not in the least bit clear which the code should do, or indeed whather it should do something else altogether. Assuming the table structure is something sane, rather than having different number of columns in different rows as suggested by the sample data (that 1 in the first row is a customer id, absent in the second third and fourth rows, isn't it?) it is trivial, assuming that the actual requirement matches either the verbal description or the sample data and results, to write a single SQL statement which will do the job rather more quickly that 3 nested loops, but as the sample data and results contradict the verbal description it is not in the least bit clear which the code should do, or indeed whather it should do something else altogether.The code doesn't help us a great deal either
Views vs Stored Procedures, whats the difference? - Microsoft SQL Server
What is the purpose of a view if I can just copy the vode from a view and put it into a stored procedure? The purpose of view is that it can be used within a query. Unlike your often ambiguous ranting I've just backed my statement up - go get Ken's book, or go and read some of the many white papers on SQL Server internals
Fetch next From c into @EmpId End Close c Deallocate c Once more, use loop only if there's some real complex operation to be performed for each of rows and can not be performed as set based - but this is a really rare case. Simple loops in general are slower than cursors as they have to execute select query in every loop, although there are cases where loop is more efficient
SQL Server (2008): Passing Table Parameter to Stored Procedure - Database Tutorials - Codecall
With SQL Server 2008 (and above), you can pass table variables to stored procedures and user defined functions and have them handle those tables without problem. CREATE TYPE NewMemberTable AS TABLE ( UsrName nvarchar(50) PRIMARY KEY , FullName nvarchar(50) NOT NULL , EmailAddy nvarchar(254) NOT NULL ); Execute that command and you will get a new data type named NewMemberTable
Overview of SQL Server Stored Procedure - CodeProject
SQL Server will inspect the code and try to use the best indexes on the tables, which are referenced by checking the statistics that are held for those tables. You can write triggers on your local Adaptive Server that executes procedures on a remote server whenever certain events, such as deletions, updates, or inserts, take place locally
How to Decrypt the Stored Procedure in Sql Server 2008? - CodeProject
See more: SQL-Server Hi to all One of my collegue was created that sp's now i want to manage all those things, i dont know how to decrypt the procedure's, we lost the copy of that procedure
I was modifying an existing query file and when I first tried, MSSQL gave me an error saying that I need to put all the data fields in the select statement in GROUP BY clause. As such, I was hoping to get the following result set: Columns: Year, Period, MonthToDate, YearToDate Row1: 2010, 0, 100, 100 Row2: 2010, 1, 0, 100 Row3: 2010, 2, 0, 100 Row4: 2010, 3, 200, 300 Row5: 2010, 4, 0, 300 Row6: 2010, 5, 0, 300 Row7: 2010, 6, 0, 300 Row8: 2010, 7, 0, 300 Row9: 2010, 8, 0, 300 Row10: 2010, 9, 300, 600 Row11: 2010, 10, 0, 600 Row12: 2010, 11, 0, 600 Row13: 2010, 12, 0, 600 It looks like I would also need some grouping on the script
Running a SQL Stored Procedure in a Loop
If you really want to process all dates even though a student doesn't appear on a given date, post back and I'll show you another little trick with a thing called a "Tally" table
I need to import the data into a SQL Server table and flip the data so that I get one record for each combination of record ID and value in the second field. Basically for one location I need the values from the record after the LAST time the RunningTotal zeros out, although it may zero out many times before
Related This entry was posted in Administration and tagged DAC, decrypting sql server stored procedures, SQL, SQLSERVER 2012, with encryption, with encryption decryptio. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Email (required) (Address never made public) Name (required) Website You are commenting using your WordPress.com account
SQL SERVER::SQL Stored Procedures
Using nested do loops is a little tricky compared to the popular nested for-loops which SQL Server does not allow STRANGE! After the loop terminates with the END statement, make sure you increment the counter otherwise you know what happens INFINITE LOOP! which we never want 3. This was very frustrating and we don't have a solution for this problems yet Example 3: Importing data from a text file into SQL Server: The text file is stored in ascii format
SQL Server 2008 Insert with WHILE LOOP - Stack Overflow
It should then look like ID Hospital ID Email Description 1 15 abc@e.com Sample Description 2 15 def@dd.com Random Text 3 32 abc@e.com Sample Description 4 32 def@dd.com Random Text Notice the above now has two new rows with ID and Hospital ID different. But occasionally as a one time thing to populate a table with a hundred records for testing purposes IMHO it's just OK to indulge yourself to use a loop
Do while loop in SQL Server 2008 - Stack Overflow
Linked 2 Iterating a SELECT statement in SQL Server 2008 using a WHILE LOOP 2 Looped insert statement in SQL Server 2008 5 Avoiding while loops in SQL when a counter is required 0 SQL + print common factors of two numbers 2 Is there a way to avoid this loop in SQL Server 2008 R2? Related 803 How to check if column exists in SQL Server table 18 Test loops at the top or bottom? (while vs. If it wasn't for all of the disdain around the use of GOTO, these might even be idiomatic solutions for those few times when these particular (evil) looping constructs are necessary in T-SQL code for the sake of clarity
Description In previous articles I explained Find First and last day of current month in SQL, Convert Rows to Columns in SQL, Joins in SQL Server and many articles relating to SQL Server
No comments:
Post a Comment